Baseline studies are crucial in understanding the impact of a project or program. Without knowing what the base situation was prior to the intervention, how will we know if the project had any effect?
Furthermore, properly constructed baselines can tell us other critical information: did the project have the effect we believed it would have? If not, was this due to project implementation (we targeted the wrong people, for example), project design processes (no or poor conflict analysis, for example) or the underlying theory of change (training village chiefs in mediation to reduce inter-ethnic tensions doesn’t actually do so because village chiefs only work on conflicts they have preference in, for example)?
Hot Resource! Developing a Baseline Study Infographic by PREVAL.org
According to Cheyanne Church and Mark Rogers in Designing for Results, “baselines are the most often forgotten component within design, monitoring and evaluation, yet they are key to proving that change has truly taken place.”1
Hot Resource! Designing for Results: Integrating Monitoring and Evaluation into Conflict Transformation Activities, Chapter 5: Baselines by Cheyanne Church and Mark Rogers
So, what is a baseline? According to the OECD, a baseline is “an analysis describing the situation prior to a development intervention, against which progress can be assessed or comparisons made.”2 It will usually come before project implementation, but after your proposed design has been funded.
Baseline v. Conflict Analysis
It is important to distinguish between a baseline and a conflict or context analysis: while similar, they are not the same and they serve different purposes. We conduct a baseline in order to establish the status of the area of intended changes for comparison purposes. Conflict analysis, on the other hand, is about understanding key factors and actors in order to inform intervention strategy.3
While conflict analysis is key for informing effective design, a baseline is key for informing progress towards intended goals and objectives. In other words, a conflict analysis comes before a baseline.
Defining the Baseline Scope
Your baseline study should be informed by your project design: what are the goals, objectives, outcomes, impacts, and indicators? Usually, your baseline will need to take initial measurements on key outcome and impact indicators, as well as other, related areas that provide greater depth and triangulation to your indicators. While high-level changes can begin to be assessed with a baseline, the focus is usually on lower and mid-level results such as outcomes.
Hot Resource! Developing a High-Quality Baseline by Salimah Samji and Mona Sur
There are, generally, three potential focuses of a baseline: primary change, secondary change, and assumptions.4
The first, primary change, will always be included in the baseline; this is, after all, the central purpose of the baseline and to not include it would just be silly. Is anyone aware of a reason to NOT include primary change in the baseline?
The second potential purpose is secondary change: to what extent has the intervention affected indirect beneficiaries? These might be secondary target audiences, or simply unintended effects on unintentional audiences. Take, for example, an experience from Search for Common Ground in Macedonia. A media intervention sought to increase children’s awareness and knowledge of the ethnic ‘other’. While children were the primary target audience, the secondary and in-direct audience was parents, who were frequently engaged in discussion by their children on the show’s themes. Provided that this is recognized in the design phase, a baseline study might seek to assess the attitudes and knowledge of parents on the ethnic ‘other’, as well as how frequently such issues are discussed with their children.
Baselines can also provide information and establish measurements on the assumptions that underpin programming. What information do managers need to determine if their assumptions in the design still hold true? For example, a project seeking to reduce youth on youth violence by training key youth in nonviolence assumes that the key issue in youth on youth violence is a lack of capacity to constructively resolve conflicts nonviolently. A baseline might, then, seek to establish whether this is indeed the case or whether there are external factors or motivations for such violence. It might be found, for example, that youth are being manipulated into violence for political gains—in which case, further activities might be required to achieve the desired reduction in youth on youth violence.
Of course, a high quality baseline requires high quality design: are your goals, objectives and indicators SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound)? Is the intervention relevant (i.e., based on a thorough and high-quality conflict analysis)?
Hot Resource! Handbook on Planning, Monitoring and Evaluating for Development Results, Box 14, page 63 by UNDP
Baselines are absolutely crucial in understanding the impact of our work. Not only do they provide an initial measurement of the areas of change desired to be affected, they provide key data for making adjustments to your intervention prior to its start—hopefully making your intervention more effective and relevant!
Jonathan White manages the Learning Portal for DM&E for Peacebuilding at Search for Common Ground. Views expressed herein do not represent SFCG, the Learning Portal or its partners or affiliates.
- 1. Cheyanne Church and Mark Rogers, Designing for Results: Integrating Monitoring and Evaluation in Conflict Transformation Activities, Chapter 5: Baseline, p. 62, 2006.
- 2. OECD, Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results-based Management, p. 18, http://dmeforpeace.org/learn/glossaries-key-terms-evaluation-and-results-based-management-15-languages.
- 3. Church and Rogers, Designing for Results, p. 63.
- 4. Church and Rogers, Designing for Results, p. 66.





10/31/2012 at 2:02 PM
Thanks for your comments Kevin and Rachel.
Kevin, you raise an interesting question, how to retro-actively gather data once a project is already underway. Depending on the M&E plan and indicators developed, this could be done through the first monitoring data collection exercise. In other words, the baseline could be constructed based off of the first monitoring data. Of course this wouldn't give you the depth usually preferred in baselines, but at least would help in measuring progress or lack thereof on key indicators. It might also be possible to adapt existing baselines from that program (if you are doing a project evaluation) to the project at hand.
Rachel, I think baselines can be done either way: internally or externally. I'd suggest that strong strategic thinking and data collection skills are more important than independence; but of course this also depends on the budget. Here at SFCG, we often do baselines in-house but we have used external consultants in the past. Going internally does raise potential issues of bias, but I think this is less a big deal than, for example, a final evaluation since there is no judgement being passed except for on the state of the conflict issues at hand. But that's why having someone external to the conflict and to the project at hand review the baseline and its methodology.
As for your conflict analysis question, while baselines and conflict analysis require similar skills, they are not the same. What is required in conflict analysis is different than baseline design and implementation. I'd prioritize getting the right skill set for the job at hand.
Cheers,
Jonathan
10/29/2012 at 1:37 PM
Great Article! Often in the field of peace building (and other non-profits) organizations jump into interventions with the best of intentions and little baseline study. You have made a compelling argument for the value of baseline studies but I wonder how this can be applied to interventions already underway? Given that many have been working for years on an intervention, how do they go back and begin the baseline process? Or should they take their baseline from the point they are at now?
Again, great article and I'm excited to dive into the resources provided!
10/25/2012 at 6:15 PM
Any thoughts on if it is prudent to have a baseline-establishment process conducted in-house, or to have an outside consultant conduct it? Should the same person(s) who conducted the conflict/context analysis carry on the baseline development as well?