Browse By Subject

Data (29)
- Bias (1)
  - Non-Sampling Error (1)
  - Researcher Bias (4)
  - Sampling Error (4)
- Collection (42)
  - Case Study (32)
  - Focus Group (14)
  - Interviews (24)
  - Observation (19)
  - Self Reporting (1)
  - Survey (13)
- Data Analysis (15)
  - Software (0)
- Methods (24)
  - Experimental Designs (10)
  - Mixed (36)
  - Qualitative (33)
  - Quantitative (14)
    Sampling (2)
  - Quasi-Experimental Designs (5)
  - Triangulation (5)
- Sampling (6)
- Statistics (3)
Design (75)
- Baseline Assessment (35)
- Budget Planning (5)
- Capacity Development (17)
- Conflict Assessment (77)
- Context Assessment (71)
- Indicators (122)
  - Benchmarks (7)
- Logic Model (32)
- M&E Plan (56)
- Partners (9)
- Proposal Writing (4)
- Risk Analysis (17)
- Theory of Change (95)
Evaluation (115)
- Approaches (28)
  - Action Evaluation (2)
  - Constructivist Evaluation (1)
  - Developmental Evaluation (7)
  - Empowerment Evaluation (2)
  - Goal-Free Evaluation (1)
  - Most Significant Change (4)
  - Outcome Evaluation (17)
  - Participatory Evaluation (16)
  - Participatory Rural Appraisal (4)
  - Performance Evaluation (4)
  - Process Analysis (3)
  - Impact Evaluation (39)
  - Rapid Rural Appraisal (4)
  - Reflecting on Peace Practice (6)
  - Theory-based Evaluation (3)
  - Utilization-focused Evaluation (6)
- Budgeting (8)
- Conducting Evaluation (37)
- Designing Evaluation (49)
- Values (7)
- Developing Methodology (47)
  - Testing Instruments (1)
- Evaluation Question (27)
- Evaluation Report Database (53)
- M&E Systems (33)
- Managing Evaluation (17)
- Purpose and Scope (30)
- Reporting (11)
- Staffing (7)
- Terms of Reference (11)
- Types (3)
  - External Evaluation (15)
  - Formative Evaluation (3)
  - Mid-Point Evaluation (0)
  - Self-Evaluation (4)
  - Summative Evaluation (4)
- Utilization (5)
  - Learning Lessons (91)
  - Reflection Process (39)
  - Results-based Management (4)
Key Issues (1)
- Peacebuilding Theme (51)
- 'Good Enough' Evaluation (25)
- Attribution (41)
- Budget Constraints (6)
- Do No Harm (41)
- Ethics (19)
- Relevance to Stakeholders (29)
- Security Constraints (16)
- Sustainability (9)
Monitoring (44)
- Compliance Monitoring (1)
- Context Monitoring (5)
- Outcome Monitoring (19)
- Output Monitoring (5)
- Reporting Monitoring Data (1)
- Utilizing Monitoring Data (26)

Browse By Type

Browse By Theme

Assessing Progress on the Road to Peace: Planning, Monitoring and Evaluating Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding Activities

Created By DM&E Administrator - 11/17/2011

Type: Analysis, Case Studies, How-to / Manual

Subject: Data, 'Good Enough' Evaluation, Attribution, Conflict Assessment, Methods, Do No Harm, Context Assessment, Theory of Change, Design, Evaluation, Monitoring

Themes: Methodology

Author / Copyright Holder: Goele Scheers [ed.]

Ratings:

Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)

Preview	Attachment	Size
	GPPAC Issue paper 5 Assessing Progress on the Road to Peace.pdf	551.9 KB

Within the field of conflict prevention, there is still a quest to find appropriate methods and ways to deal with planning, monitoring and evaluation. This issue paper brings together the experiences of academics and practitioners dealing with planning, monitoring and evaluating conflict prevention activities.

This GPPAC Issue Paper #5 contains:

ABOUT THIS ISSUE PAPER 5

INTRODUCTION 7

1. AID FOR PEACE: PLANNING AND EVALUATION IN CONFLICT ZONES LUC REYCHLER 9

2. CIVIL SOCIETY: ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF CONFLICT PREVENTION AND PEACEBUILDING

ACTIVITIES JOS DE LA HAYE 18

3. THE EVALUATION OF CONFLICT PREVENTION PROGRAMMING: CHALLENGES FOR GPPAC PETER

WOODROW 22

4. COMPLEXITY AND INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL CHANGE NETWORKS RICARDO WILSON-GRAU 28

5. MEASURING SUCCESS IN COMPLEX SETTINGS: THE EXPERIENCES OF GPPAC WITH PLANNING,

MONITORING AND EVALUATION GOELE SCHEERS 38

6. THE LAC PLATFORM’S APPROACH TO MONITORING AND EVALUATION: SOME REFLECTIONS

ANA BOURSE 47

7. NANSEN DIALOGUE - DIALOGUE IN PRACTICE: CHALLENGES FOR EVALUATION DANIJELA

GALOVIC AND GORAN LOJANCIC 51

CONCLUSION 57

THE GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP FOR THE PREVENTION OF ARMED CONFLICT 59