Browse By Subject

Data (29)
- Bias (1)
  - Non-Sampling Error (1)
  - Researcher Bias (4)
  - Sampling Error (4)
- Collection (42)
  - Case Study (32)
  - Focus Group (14)
  - Interviews (24)
  - Observation (19)
  - Self Reporting (1)
  - Survey (13)
- Data Analysis (15)
  - Software (0)
- Methods (24)
  - Experimental Designs (10)
  - Mixed (36)
  - Qualitative (33)
  - Quantitative (14)
    Sampling (2)
  - Quasi-Experimental Designs (5)
  - Triangulation (5)
- Sampling (6)
- Statistics (3)
Design (76)
- Baseline Assessment (35)
- Budget Planning (5)
- Capacity Development (17)
- Conflict Assessment (77)
- Context Assessment (70)
- Indicators (121)
  - Benchmarks (7)
- Logic Model (31)
- M&E Plan (55)
- Partners (9)
- Proposal Writing (4)
- Risk Analysis (17)
- Theory of Change (95)
Evaluation (115)
- Approaches (28)
  - Action Evaluation (2)
  - Constructivist Evaluation (1)
  - Developmental Evaluation (7)
  - Empowerment Evaluation (2)
  - Goal-Free Evaluation (1)
  - Most Significant Change (4)
  - Outcome Evaluation (17)
  - Participatory Evaluation (16)
  - Participatory Rural Appraisal (4)
  - Performance Evaluation (4)
  - Process Analysis (3)
  - Impact Evaluation (39)
  - Rapid Rural Appraisal (4)
  - Reflecting on Peace Practice (6)
  - Theory-based Evaluation (3)
  - Utilization-focused Evaluation (6)
- Budgeting (8)
- Conducting Evaluation (36)
- Designing Evaluation (48)
- Values (7)
- Developing Methodology (46)
  - Testing Instruments (1)
- Evaluation Question (28)
- Evaluation Report Database (53)
- M&E Systems (33)
- Managing Evaluation (17)
- Purpose and Scope (30)
- Reporting (11)
- Staffing (7)
- Terms of Reference (11)
- Types (3)
  - External Evaluation (15)
  - Formative Evaluation (3)
  - Mid-Point Evaluation (0)
  - Self-Evaluation (4)
  - Summative Evaluation (4)
- Utilization (5)
  - Learning Lessons (91)
  - Reflection Process (39)
  - Results-based Management (4)
Key Issues (1)
- Peacebuilding Theme (50)
- 'Good Enough' Evaluation (24)
- Attribution (40)
- Budget Constraints (6)
- Do No Harm (40)
- Ethics (19)
- Relevance to Stakeholders (29)
- Security Constraints (16)
- Sustainability (9)
Monitoring (43)
- Compliance Monitoring (1)
- Context Monitoring (5)
- Outcome Monitoring (19)
- Output Monitoring (5)
- Reporting Monitoring Data (1)
- Utilizing Monitoring Data (26)

Browse By Type

Browse By Theme

Third Generation PCIA: Introducing the Aid for Peace Approach

Created By Jonathan White - 11/21/2011

Type: Analysis

Subject: Learning Lessons, Approaches, Outcome Monitoring, Attribution, Conflict Assessment, Do No Harm, Indicators, Theory of Change

Themes: Training, Methodology

Author / Copyright Holder: Thania Paffenholz

Ratings:

Your rating: None

Preview	Attachment	Size
	Paffenholz_Third Generation PCIA.pdf	368.79 KB

This article presents the newly developed Aid for Peace approach. This approach builds on the debate of "Peace and Conflict Impact Assessment" and presents a further development of this debate.

This article presents the newly developed Aid for Peace approach. The Aid for Peace approach builds on the debate of “Peace and Conflict Impact Assessment” and presents a further development of this debate. The Aid for Peace approach is a multi-purpose and multi-level process that facilitates the planning, assessment and evaluation of peace as well as aid interventions in situations of latent conflict, manifest violent conflict, or in the aftermath of violent conflict and war. The essence of the Aid for Peace approach is a basic model that focuses on the needs for peacebuilding in a given country or area, tailors the intervention’s objectives and activities to these needs through identifying their peacebuilding relevance and developing peace and conflict resultchains and indicators for monitoring. From the basic model, separate modules have been developed for planning, assessment and evaluation purposes focussing on peace or aid interventions.